Review: Point Salad

Introduction & Overview

Point Salad is a fast and fun card game for the whole family. With over 100 different ways to score, players will have to assemble their best salads of veggies… and points!

Cover
Cover

This is the premise behind Point Salad, designed by Molly Johnson, Robert Melvin, and Shawn Stankewich, marking the debut title from this design trio. The original edition was first published in 2019 by Alderac Entertainment Group (AEG) in English. Illustrations are handled by Dylan Mangini (Mephisto: The Card Game).

In Spain, it is published in a Spanish edition by Devir (although the game is completely language-independent). It accommodates 2 to 6 players, with a recommended minimum age of 8 and an approximate playing time of 15 to 30 minutes. The retail price is €11.95. For this review, we used a review copy of Devir’s Spanish edition, kindly provided by the publisher.

Back Cover
Back Cover

Important: if you already know the game and/or are only interested in my opinion about it, you can go directly to the Opinion section. The Content and Mechanics sections are especially intended for those who do not know the game and prefer to get a general idea of how it works.



Components

Inside a hinged metal tin measuring 11.9 × 9.4 × 2 cm (dimensions similar to the Ramen box, albeit slightly wider), we find the following items:

  • 108 Cards (63.5 × 88 mm)
  • Rulebook
Components
Components

How to Play

Point Salad is a very straightforward card filler where each card depicts a veggie on one side (there are six types) and a scoring condition on the other. The cards are arranged into three draw piles showing their point condition sides, and two rows of three cards are then formed by drafting two cards from each pile and placing them veggie-side up. On their turn, the active player must either draft two veggie cards and add them to their play area, or take one point card and place it in front of them. Additionally, a player may flip a point card over to its veggie side once per turn (flipping a veggie into a point card is never allowed). When a player drafts veggies, the resulting empty spaces are immediately replenished by revealing cards from the draw pile of the corresponding column. Once all cards have been drafted, end-game scoring takes place.


Key Concepts

Let us begin with the Veggie Cards. Across the deck we find six vegetable varieties: cabbage (purple background), onion (magenta background), lettuce (green background), carrot (orange background), tomato (red background), and pepper (yellow background). These cards are laid out in a shared market of two rows of three, and players may draft two face-up cards on their turn.

Veggies
Veggies

The reverse of these cards reveals the Point Cards. Each outlines a specific scoring condition that awards victory points based on the veggie cards collected by that player over the course of the game. These conditions are evaluated strictly at the end of the game. Certain criteria compare totals against other players, though only the cardholder can score those points. In the upper-left and lower-right corners, icons and colors indicate which veggie the card shows on its reverse side; during the game, players may flip point cards into veggies, but reversing the process is never permitted.

Point Cards
Point Cards

That is enough to get started.


Preparación de la Partida

  1. Depending on the player count, remove 12/9/6/3/0 cards of each vegetable type for games of 2/3/4/5/6 players, returning them to the box.
  2. Shuffle the remaining cards and split them into three roughly equal draw piles, placing them in a row with their point condition face up.
  3. Next, reveal the top two cards from each pile and place them directly below in the same column, creating two rows of three veggie cards beneath the draw piles.
  4. Finally, randomly select a starting player.

We are ready to begin!

Game Setup
Game Setup

Game Flow

A game of Point Salad is played over an indeterminate series of alternating turns, beginning with the starting player and proceeding clockwise.

On each turn, the active player must choose one of two options:

  • Draft two veggie cards from the veggie market and place them in their play area (organized by type and fanned out so card counts remain visible). Empty spaces in the market are immediately replenished by drawing from the pile directly above that column. If a pile runs out, split one of the larger remaining piles roughly in half, taking care not to move the bottom half displaying the active point card.
  • Draft one point card from the top of the three draw piles, placing it in a row above the veggie columns in their play area.

Additionally, as a free action, a player may flip a point card to its veggie side, sliding it into the appropriate vegetable column.

Once completed, the turn passes to the player on the left.


Game End

The game ends once all cards from the market and draw piles have been drafted. Players tally their point cards based on their collected veggies, and the player with the most victory points wins. In the event of a tie, victory goes to whichever tied player went latest in the turn order.


Variants

Multi-Round Match: Players agree on a set number of rounds beforehand. Scores across all rounds are summed up, and whoever achieves the highest overall total wins. At 2–3 players, you can set up 3 or 2 identical decks ahead of time and play consecutive rounds with each pre-shuffled deck.


Personal Opinion

Today we look at one of those filler card games that serves as a pure statement of intent, where the title alone tells you everything you need to know. Classic examples like 6 Nimmt! (tocho-review here) or No Thanks! (tocho-review here) require very little elaboration to get the point across. Let’s see how it holds up at the table, but first, a quick thank you to Devir for providing the review copy that makes this write-up possible.

I say the title is a statement of intent because it plays on a quintessential hobby term born from the world of eurogames: “Point Salad“, esto es, a design where virtually every action yields points through multiple avenues. At the same time, it leans into the literal pun by centering gameplay around the real-world ingredients you would toss into a bowl: tomatoes, onions, peppers, lettuce, cabbages, and carrots.

The core loop could not be leaner. We have a deck where each card features one of six vegetable types on one side and a scoring condition tailored to those vegetables on the other. These criteria are varied, ranging from simple flat bonuses (or penalties) per vegetable icon to comparative awards evaluated against opponents’ tableaus.

All cards are set up in a central market showing two rows of three veggies below three draw piles that showcase their point condition. A player’s turn comes down to either drafting two of the six face-up veggies (replenishing the slots immediately afterward) or grabbing one of the three face-up point cards. Optionally, should a scoring condition fail to deliver sufficient value, we can flip that card over to its veggie side.

Market Detail
Market Detail

Turns breeze by until the supply is entirely exhausted, whereupon everyone evaluates their selected conditions against the veggies collected in their tableau. That is all there is to it.

The gameplay centers on two core mechanics—open drafting and set collection—through which we work to optimize end-game scoring efficiency. The first comparison that comes to mind is Sprawlopolis (tocho-review here), thanks to dual-sided cards featuring scoring criteria on one face and scored elements on the reverse. It is an inspired design choice that guarantees vast replayability; even within a ten-to-fifteen-minute filler, identical board states rarely emerge.

I particularly enjoy the card-cycling dynamic, which often reveals an attractive scoring card sitting atop a draw pile that would heavily reward an opponent. In most drafting games, hate-drafting requires taking the card directly. Here, the dual-sided nature provides an alternative: drafting veggies from beneath that specific column forces the top card of the pile to flip down into the market as a vegetable before the next player can claim its scoring face.

Naturally, drafting veggies is the more efficient tempo move, as they provide the actual scoring fuel, demanding a surgeon’s touch when picking scoring cards. Taking a scoring card yields only one card for your turn, whereas taking veggies grants two—cards that can potentially be scored across multiple objectives simultaneously. This dynamic is the beating heart of Point Salad, and snatching a win with just a handful of finely tuned point cards feels genuinely rewarding.

Luck inevitably wields a notable influence. No matter how cleanly you plan, arriving at your turn with poor options in the market may force you into drafting cards that disrupt your scoring synergy. In these spots, the conservative move is taking a scoring condition that simply avoids negative points. Suffer a couple of these dead turns, and a match can slip away. Thankfully, games wrap up in ten minutes, making an immediate rematch painless.

It is worth measuring this against other drafting benchmarks, such as Sushi Go! (tocho-review here). The sushi-themed classic offers slightly more direct interaction and structure through simultaneous hand management and distinct scoring rounds.

In terms of raw feel, however, the truest analogue is Fantasy Realms (tocho-review here), as both demand committing to distinct combo engines and chasing maximum multipliers. Sometimes everything clicks and the needed veggies fall right into your lap; other times, the exact cards you crave appear between turns only to vanish before play comes back around.

Onion Detail
Onion Detail

Player interaction in Point Salad boils down to tactical hate-drafting against the next seat and competing for majority-based scoring conditions. In the final turns, the market might hold types that actively harm an opponent; playing ahead of them allows you to manipulate the row so they are forced into taking cards that ding their score.

This brings us to the design’s weakest point: the endgame. It feels as though the designers struck upon an ingenious core loop but lacked a clean way to close it out. Replenishing rules mandate drawing from the pile directly above an empty slot, splitting adjacent piles when one runs dry. Eventually, the draw piles deplete entirely, which can leave an odd number of cards in the market, forcing the final player to take a lone vegetable—one that might even score negative points. This uneven ending also means players do not always take an equal number of turns.

A designated reserve deck used strictly when standard piles run dry might have smoothed this out, triggering a clean end-of-round sequence so that everyone receives equal turns and retains the full choice between veggies and point cards.

While not a fatal flaw, it creates an awkward finish. It leaves a bit of an anticlimactic aftertaste, particularly when late turns run on autopilot because your strategy is locked in and the market has run out of viable cards.

Even so, the bulk of the playtime delivers a genuinely satisfying puzzle as you tune your combos. Given how quickly rounds play out, any minor stumble is easily remedied by shuffling up and going again.

Tomato Detail
Tomato Detail

Regarding player scaling, the game runs smoothly across all group sizes, though higher player counts naturally introduce more volatility and chaos. That added unpredictability does not harm the experience, but the sweet spot sits at 2–3 players. At those lower counts, you can also leverage the full deck to run consecutive games back-to-back without reshuffling.

Production-wise, the game comes in a handy metal tin (prone to denting, mind you) that holds the cards split into two wells. The cardstock has a decent core, smooth finish, and fair snap. Sleeving is highly recommended due to the constant handling, though doing so requires ditching the internal plastic insert. The rulebook is structured reasonably well, though it leaves edge cases unaddressed—such as confirming that a lone remaining market card is simply taken by the final player, or clarifying that possessing zero cards does not satisfy “even” conditions (a rule clarified by the designers post-release, despite zero mathematically being an even number).

Visually, the graphic design is strictly utilitarian and free of flair, featuring flat emoji-like vegetables against dotted gradient backgrounds. It does its job cleanly on the table, even if it will never turn heads for artistic ambition.

And let’s wrap this up. Point Salad is a card filler where players assemble vegetable engines around custom scoring criteria they draft themselves. Its main drawbacks are a noticeable dose of luck and an unpolished endgame that can lead to hollow, uneven final turns. Otherwise, it delivers exactly what it sets out to do, and its brisk playtime makes chaining multiple rounds an absolute breeze. For all of this, I give it a…

Notable

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *